Thank you for subscribing! You have also earned a badge!
Thank you! Your answer will help ###name### and ###num### other people!
Check awaiting answers to see more people who need help.
Thank you! Your answer will help ###name### and ###num### other people!
Subscribe to "Invite Answer"emails and help others with product questions will earn you "Helpful Badge"!
We invite you to subscribe to our Invite Answer email!
Subscribe and you’ll be invited to answer product’s question by email, which will also earn you a "Helpful Badge"! You can cancel any time on the privacy settings page.
nisim p.s. after 1 month . So...I listened to BW-WA3 for a month, and I will say that the sound quality, bass, depth and saturation of BW-WA2 is noticeably better. my old WA2 has gone bad . And hooray BW-WA2 is back on sale. And I ordered BW-WA2 again. it even sounds better to me than JBL-5. And the BW-WA3 has a louder sound, but it's kind of dry. The sound power is 100 watts (which doesn't really correspond to the sound power, I don't know, maybe rgb LEDs consume another 30 watts. all together 100 watts?) it doesn't really matter to me, the main thing is the sound quality. The main speakers of the BW-WA3 have 6 ohms of 25 Watts each. This is the same as 16 watts of 4 ohms. The BW-WA2 has smaller speakers, but with an honest power of 2 x 10 watts and 4 ohms. and very successful soft passive lateral bass membranes . Thus, the BW-WA3 has only 1.5 times more power.