s a problem, I mentioned that AF. It is very difficult and most of the time, even with manual adjustment, the recording will not be adequate. I used 70-300 optics, and with the 300 setting, the recording was almost completely blurry. Even if set to 70, it is still acceptable. If they can solve it, please let me know. (NIKON3200) Thank you in advance too!

s a problem, I mentioned that AF. It is very difficult and most of the time, even with manual adjustment, the recording will not be adequate. I used 70-300 optics, and with the 300 setting, the recording was almost completely blurry. Even if set to 70, it is still acceptable. If they can solve it, please let me know. (NIKON3200) Thank you in advance too!

s a problem, I mentioned that AF. It is very difficult and most of the time, even with manual adjustment, the recording will not be adequate. I used 70-300 optics, and with the 300 setting, the recording was almost completely blurry. Even if set to 70, it is still acceptable. If they can solve it, please let me know. (NIKON3200) Thank you in advance too!

Dobra jakość na srodku, brzegi srednio. Fajny gadzet.

Dobra jakość na srodku, brzegi srednio. Fajny gadzet.

Dobra jakość na srodku, brzegi srednio. Fajny gadzet.

I like this 2x zoom on my cam

I like this 2x zoom on my cam

I like this 2x zoom on my cam

受け取ったアイテムと迅速なサービスに感銘を受けます。 宣伝通りだ。

Received item and is impressed with the speedy service. Just as advertised.

受け取ったアイテムと迅速なサービスに感銘を受けます。 宣伝通りだ。

了解

ok

了解

説明通りの良品。

Good Product as described.

説明通りの良品。

fine

fine

fine

The price being very low means it cannot be a a real loss buying it. Howether, it works better on some lenses than other. On the kit lens at 55mm focal lenght, it works fine and makes it a 110mm focal plus crop factor, meaning about 165mm focal lenght on a canon APS-C. It actually is good at transforming the basic kit lens into a basic tele lens, and therefore a small entry into telephotography. 13,5€ will allways be more affordable than a genuine tele lens with at least 80€ cost for the renown yet rather low quality Tamron 70-300 or the very correct 55-250 of canon costing about 150€. Howether, do NOT buy it as a way to make a genuine tele lens more tele unless you are keen on lomography. It would make chromatic aberrations appears commonly. Anyway, if you actually like lomography yet not the film technology itself, you can transform the canon 55-250 into a 500mm that makes lomography holga lens looking pictures. Like I said, the 110 or 165mm (crop factor) pictures with kit lens are actually good with it, and not reaching the lomography philosophy.

The price being very low means it cannot be a a real loss buying it. Howether, it works better on some lenses than other. On the kit lens at 55mm focal lenght, it works fine and makes it a 110mm focal plus crop factor, meaning about 165mm focal lenght on a canon APS-C. It actually is good at transforming the basic kit lens into a basic tele lens, and therefore a small entry into telephotography. 13,5€ will allways be more affordable than a genuine tele lens with at least 80€ cost for the renown yet rather low quality Tamron 70-300 or the very correct 55-250 of canon costing about 150€. Howether, do NOT buy it as a way to make a genuine tele lens more tele unless you are keen on lomography. It would make chromatic aberrations appears commonly. Anyway, if you actually like lomography yet not the film technology itself, you can transform the canon 55-250 into a 500mm that makes lomography holga lens looking pictures. Like I said, the 110 or 165mm (crop factor) pictures with kit lens are actually good with it, and not reaching the lomography philosophy.

The price being very low means it cannot be a a real loss buying it. Howether, it works better on some lenses than other. On the kit lens at 55mm focal lenght, it works fine and makes it a 110mm focal plus crop factor, meaning about 165mm focal lenght on a canon APS-C. It actually is good at transforming the basic kit lens into a basic tele lens, and therefore a small entry into telephotography. 13,5€ will allways be more affordable than a genuine tele lens with at least 80€ cost for the renown yet rather low quality Tamron 70-300 or the very correct 55-250 of canon costing about 150€. Howether, do NOT buy it as a way to make a genuine tele lens more tele unless you are keen on lomography. It would make chromatic aberrations appears commonly. Anyway, if you actually like lomography yet not the film technology itself, you can transform the canon 55-250 into a 500mm that makes lomography holga lens looking pictures. Like I said, the 110 or 165mm (crop factor) pictures with kit lens are actually good with it, and not reaching the lomography philosophy.

Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks.

good product

good product

good product